Have You Banned the Box?

by | Jun 9, 2022

RKW Header

Despite Baltimore City’s ordinance requiring certain questions on employment applications be banned, many employers remain out of compliance. The 2014 law requires that public and private employers with 10 or more employees working in the city remove from their employment applications questions asking candidates about their criminal backgrounds. It also prohibits inquiries to prospective candidates about their criminal backgrounds during the initial interview. Criminal background inquiries can be made after an offer of conditional employment is made.

The purpose of the ordinance is to eliminate discrimination of applicants with criminal histories. The law, however, provides two exceptions. First, it does not apply to employers who are authorized by federal, state or local laws to consider an applicant’s criminal history. For example, a transportation company has the right to inquire into an applicant’s driving convictions pursuant to Department of Transportation licensing regulations.

Second, the law does not apply to employers that provide programs, services, or direct care to minors or vulnerable adults. So an elementary school, for example, retains the right to inquire about sexual abuse convictions of its applicants.

Violations of the law can result in criminal penalties up to a $500 fine and 90 days in prison for each offense. Monetary damages may also be awarded to those individuals who file a complaint with the Baltimore Community Relations Commission.

Employers in Baltimore City should immediately review their employment applications and hiring processes to ensure compliance. Any questions on applications pertaining to criminal history should be removed and any recruiting or hiring personnel should be apprised of this requirement through training and policy revisions.

Questions about this law should be directed to Laura L. Rubenstein, Esq. at RKW Law Group, (443)379-4013 or LRubenstein@RKWlawgroup.com.

 

Author Profile

Laura L. Rubenstein
Laura L. Rubenstein
‍Laura L. Rubenstein heads RKW’s Labor and Employment practice group. She represents employers, providing education on compliance with a goal of avoiding the courtroom. Laura focuses on the defense of FLSA and state wage disputes, ADA accommodations, FMLA leave, harassment, discrimination and retaliation. Laura frequently drafts critical documents including employment contracts, restrictive covenants, and severance/separation agreements, and handles sensitive employment investigations, ensuring confidence throughout the process.

Laura counsels boards of directors and C-level executives on governance, policy and best practices. She also provides on-site training for managers, supervisors and executives to help reduce liability and promote a more harmonious and productive workplace.

Laura has handled hundreds of investigations by state and federal departments of labor, the EEOC, and other federal and state agencies on matters related to harassment, discrimination, wage claims, independent contractor disputes, employee classification and other statutory claims.

Post Categories

Most Recent Articles

Keeping Tabs on the Agenda of the EEOC

Keeping Tabs on the Agenda of the EEOC

Shortly after taking office, President Trump swiftly reshaped the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), with changes that were, frankly, anticipated by employment lawyers who have watched the pendulum swing with each new administration. He dismissed the...

To DEI or Not

To DEI or Not

As you know from previous updates, a Maryland Federal Court enjoined President Trump’s Executive Order attempting to eliminate DEI initiatives. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the injunction for now while the issue continues to play out through the court...

Update on Implementation of Maryland’s FAMLI Law

Update on Implementation of Maryland’s FAMLI Law

On February 14, 2025, the Maryland Department of Labor (MD DOL) proposed delaying implementation of the upcoming Family and Medical Leave Insurance (FAMLI) program suggesting that employers and workers need additional time to prepare for the launch. Under the new...